Top 10 platforms for brands to grow sales

Want strong UGC without wasting time and money?

Start here.

Whether you're comparing prices, features, or just curious about alternatives, here's an overview of the 10 best alternatives to Webcontent.

We've evaluated each platform based on what matters most:

• Platform fees

• Number of creators

• Delivery time

• Editing options

• Geographical coverage

No hype - just the facts so you can find the solution that best suits your business.

TL;DR - Why Webcontent is often best

• Webcontent is among the most attractive choices for high-quality UGC , with full control and transparent pricing.

• Platform fee of only 10%, where many others are between 15-50%.

• Unlimited edits, real-time chat with creators, AI and editing in multiple languages.

• Best for brands that want to test, scale and optimize ads continuously.

• Delivery time in a few days and the ability to work directly with creators without intermediaries.

Why Webcontent ranks #1

At first glance, Webcontent may seem like a more expensive solution than some competitors. But if you look at the bigger picture, the story is different.

Most UGC take large percentages of your budget in platform fees. If you pay a creator £1,000, half of it could end up with the platform - instead of the content creator.

Webcontent does it differently.
You pay creators directly and the platform fee is only 10%. This means more of your budget goes to the content itself - not hidden costs.

No matter what subscription you have, you get:

• Unlimited campaigns

• Unlimited fixes

• Direct communication with creators

• Access to 2500 creators per month across Scandinavia

• Full usage rights to all content

• AI Script Generator to create winning ads

• Dedicated creative sparring

For brands that produce UGC on a large scale, these savings can quickly add up to thousands of dollars.

10 best alternatives to Webcontent

If you want to explore other options in UGC, influencer collaborations or campaign automation, here are some of the most popular alternatives in 2025.

1. billo

Benefits:

• Fast delivery (5-7 days)

• User-friendly platform

• Good for small campaigns and tests

Disadvantages:

• Quality may vary

• Few fixes included

• Not suitable for long-term collaborations

Billo vs. Webcontent:
Billo charges around 30% in fees, while Webcontent only charges 10%. Webcontent also offers unlimited corrections, AI and a larger network of creators.

2. Insense

Benefits:

• Well-filtered creators

• Good license terms

• Whitelisting option for ads

Disadvantages:

• More expensive than many alternatives

• Monthly fee, even without activity

Insense vs. Webcontent:
Webcontent has unlimited fixes, greater geographical reach (23+ countries) and AI like Script Generator and AI avatars.

3. Skeepers

Benefits:

• Integration for e-commerce

• Combines UGC and customer reviews

Disadvantages:

• High prices and long contracts

• Less flexibility

Skeepers vs. Webcontent:
Webcontent offers faster collaboration, unlimited edits and a much more flexible, no-strings-attached model.

4. useclip

Benefits:

• Cheap pay-per-video model

• Fast delivery

Disadvantages:

• Quality can fluctuate

• No advanced tools required

Useclip vs. Webcontent:
Webcontent offers better creator quality, global campaign options and built-in AI.

5 Usetwirl

Benefits:

• Sharp on TikTok trends

• Budget-friendly for startups

Disadvantages:

• Limited creative control

• No direct contact to creators

Usetwirl vs. Webcontent:
Webcontent offers direct communication, unlimited corrections and a much larger network of creators.

6. Advertace

Benefits:

• Specialized in ads

• Creative strategy included

Disadvantages:

• Animals per video

• No direct access to creators

Advertace vs. Webcontent:
Webcontent is cheaper at scale, offers self-service and more tools for creative control.

7. Speekly

Benefits:

• Fast and cheap

• Good for testimonials

Disadvantages:

• Simple production without high quality

• Not suitable for paid ads

Speekly vs. Webcontent:
Webcontent delivers ad-ready quality, global reach and full control over content.

8. Neads

Benefits:

• Combines strategy, production and advertising

Disadvantages:

• Very high prices

• No self-service

Neads vs. Webcontent:
Webcontent offers flexibility, faster production and cheaper access to a large creator.

9. Collabstr

Benefits:

• Transparent pricing

• Both UGC and influencer collaborations

Disadvantages:

• Big difference in quality

• Lacking strategic tools

Collabstr vs. Webcontent:
Webcontent provides unlimited edits, direct collaboration and AI tools for brief writing.

10. Youdji

Benefits:

• Fast and low-cost production

• Simple setup

Disadvantages:

• Minimal editing

• Limited creator network

Youdji vs. Webcontent:
Webcontent offers larger networks, better quality, full editing control and global campaign opportunities.

Conclusion - Should you choose Webcontent?

If you want to produce high-quality UGC with full control and transparent costs Webcontent is one of the strongest choices in 2025.

• Low platform fee (10%)

• Unlimited fixes

• AI for scripts and ideation

• Global reach in 23+ countries

• Direct contact with creators without intermediaries

This makes Webcontent ideal for small webshops, larger e-commerce brands and agencies that want scalable, ad-ready content - fast.